Managing Equality and Diversity- Case Study Jakob Roan Essay

Managing comparability and Diversity- Case Study Jakob Roan - Essay ExampleIn 1999, the UK government introduced the Public Sector Duties in order to protect not only the women but also the men on pass equality. The compare Act 2006 was introduced to promote equality and diversity in relation to the importance of human rights. Because of some amendments obligatory to strengthen the equality law in the United Kingdom, Equality Act 2010 was created and now in top executive in order to redefine the most recent employment-related claims at the Employment Tribunal office.Against who and Potential licit Claims that Jakob Roan can buoy bring to an Employment TribunalLucas and TomSexual harassment at work is not limited to the act of physically forcing an employee to have sex with an immediate boss or crime versa. grammatical constituenticularly in the vitrine of Jakob Roan, verbal harassment like a constant regime of homophobic behaviour has been evident when Lucas and Tom were mak ing funny faces while calling Jakob with the use of some pique names and remarks like a prude, a blooming gay boy, suggesting that he should be more macho, and spreading rumours to other employees that they should avoid working with Jakob alone in the office because they can get AIDS by being too close to him. This increases Jakobs chances of winning a tourist court display case . Regardless of whether it was intentional or unintentional, Jakob was able to witness Lucas spreading homophobic remarks about him where the attach tos customers could hear.... Furthermore, forcing Jakob to join Lucas and Tom go through the pornographic magazine was already a misdemeanor of Jakobs human right to avoid staring at some pornographic materials. beneath Part 2 section 26(1)(b)(i)(ii) of the Equality Act 2010, it was clearly stated that A individual (A) harasses another (B) if the brook has the purpose or effect of violating Bs dignity and creating intimidating, hostile, degrading, humilia ting or offensive surround for B. It means that harassment within the workplace may occur when the dignity of another person is being violated and degraded as a result of unwanted work-related practices that are sexual by nature5. As an individual, Jakob has negative perception with regards to the use of pornographic materials. The fact that Lucas and Tom was forcing Jakob to join them as they stray the magazine was already a violation of Jakobs dignity and human rights to refuse to participate. Based on the guidelines stated under Equality Act 2010, it is clear that Jakob has the option and privileges to file a tribunal case against Lucas and Tom for harassment on the grounds of sexual orientation. Specifically the case of Jakob Roan who emotionally, mentally, and psychologically suffered from the unfortunate consequences associated with sexual harassment on the grounds of sexual orientation is very much similar to the case of Morse v Future Reality Ltd 19966 wherein Ms. Morse fe lt sexually harassed when a aggroup of her male co-workers started downloading sexually explicit images from the Internet even though the boys were not directly pointing at her. Dave Under Part 2 section 13(1) of the Equality Act 2010, direct discrimination